![]() One word of caution: the woofers present a 6 ohm impedance and have a low pass filter at 120 Hz. For each stereo channel, I run a wire from the amp to the woofer binding post and a wire from the sat with a banana connector to the woofer to attach. The woofer terminals can take 2 wire leads- a wire that is threaded into the binding post, and a banana connector. Woofers and sats should be wired in parallel on a single set of amp outputs. The original woofers have a little better build quality with a Formica covering on the enclosures. There are small differences between the original and new version woofers with the new having some flares on the cones to improve dispersion, but I couldn't hear any difference. The newer version satellites have 2 switches on the back to do 3db cuts and boosts of the high and midranges, but I always set them flat so the original sats are not at a disadvantage, and in any case the CSW MC100 is in my view superior with these woofers. There were two versions of the ensemble- I've owned both. ![]() The sound is quite good.Ī cotton swab and rubbing alcohol will take the sticky coating off the ensemble sats. The woofers can be hidden along a wall leaving listeners scratching their head wondering where the speakers are. The pairing of the MC100's to the ensemble woofers produces an amazing system. These have a high pass filter at 198Hz and are less efficient than the ensemble sats. As a result, many CSW ensemble satellites find their way into HT setups or mated to powered subwoofers and the woofers find their way to goodwill, where they often go for $20/pair.Ī more interesting solution is to match the ensemble woofers to CSW MC100 satellites. ![]() The ensemble satellites supplied with the system are excellent, but they are more efficient than the woofers leading many listeners to think the woofers don't produce much bass. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |